Alain Jean-Mairet » Les immigrants qui ont la vie vraiment dure en Europe sont… les ex-Musulmans
Compte TwitterAccueil

Les immigrants qui ont la vie vraiment dure en Europe sont… les ex-Musulmans

À en croire un papier du Washington Times d’hier repris par le Brussel Journal:

Ehsan Jami is a 22-year-old local councilor and member of the socialist Labor Party (PvdA) in the Dutch town of Leidschendam. His party, which belongs to the ruling government coalition in the Netherlands, is eager to get rid of him because… he is a Muslim apostate.

Le jeune homme a décidé de lire le Coran avec un esprit libéré de la foi sinon obligatoire dans l’Islam selon laquelle tout ce qui s’y trouve est parfait:

Thirteen years ago, Mr. Jami’s family moved from Iran to the Netherlands. When he was a young boy, Mohammed was his “hero,” Mr. Jami said. But after reading the Koran he discovered that the prophet was “a criminal,” he recently told the Dutch paper Trouw: “If Mohammed were alive today, he would be in the same league as Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein […] It was a deception to discover who Mohammed truly is. My great admiration for him has turned into deep contempt.”

Et il en a courageusement tiré les conséquences:

Early last month, Mr. Jami announced his intention to establish a Committee for Ex-Muslims, which he will launch officially in September at an international press conference.

Mais dès que des Musulmans votent en nombres substantiels, la politique peine à soutenir les gens à la fois raisonnables et courageux:

His initiative has enraged Islamist fanatics, but also his own party, the PvdA. An internal memo [pdf] sent to PvdA congressmen and cabinet ministers, shows that the party fears that Mr. Jami’s campaign will cause considerable electoral damage among Muslim voters.

There are 1 million Muslims in the Netherlands. Most of them are Moroccans and Turks. They make up the bulk of the 1.7 million immigrants in the country, which has a population of 16.3 million people. Many immigrants have been given Dutch nationality and the right to vote. This has turned them into a power block that tipped the balance in the local elections in March 2006 in favor of the PvdA, a party very keen to cater for the immigrants’ demands. In major Dutch cities where the PvdA is the largest party, such as Amsterdam and Rotterdam, almost half the elected PvdA politicians are Muslims. […]

Alors, il faut redoubler de courage:

Mr. Jami, however, refuses to renounce his plan, despite receiving hate mail and threats from Islamists, but also from PvdA executives. He also refuses to leave the PvdA, as Ayaan Hirsi Ali did in 2002. The latter began her political career with the PvdA, but joined the conservative VVD because the PvdA did not allow her to speak freely about the emancipation of Islamic women. Last year, Ms. Hirsi Ali fell out with the VVD as well and left the Netherlands for Washington. Mr. Jami said he “wants to change the PvdA from the inside.” Mr. Terstall reproaches him for “exclusively surrounding himself with whites.”

Et cette situation n’est pas limitée à la Hollande:

The Dutch PvdA is not the only political party in Europe that is careful not to “upset” Muslim radicals. In neighboring Belgium, too, last month’s general elections showed how influential the immigrant vote has become. Ergun Top, a Turkish-born Belgian politician who is a local Christian-Democrat councilor in Antwerp (although he is a Muslim), declared that if there ever were a war between Belgium and Turkey, he would join the Turkish army and fight Belgium. His loyalty obviously lies with his country of origin, as it does for the majority of the immigrants who have become Belgian citizens in the past decades.

Belgium has 10.5 million inhabitants, of whom 900,000 legal aliens and 650,000 so-called new Belgians — foreigners who have acquired Belgian nationality since 1980. About 500,000 Belgian inhabitants are Muslims, mostly Moroccans and Turks. The foreigners have imported their own domestic quarrels and hangups into Belgian politics. As in the Netherlands, the 1915 Armenian genocide suddenly became a hot topic in Belgium’s election debates. In order not to antagonize Turkish voters both Johan Vande Lanotte, the leader of the Socialist Party, and Yves Leterme, the leader of the Christian-Democrats, refused to call the massacre of the 1.5 million Armenians a genocide. Vande Lanotte said the Armenian issue is “extremely sensitive,” while Mr. Leterme told the Turkish newspaper Zaman that “international experts disagree on the historical facts.” Mr. Leterme, who won the elections, is expected to become Belgium’s new prime minister later this month.

Et cela a des conséquences extrêmement profondes pour la vision du monde des générations à venir:

As the Islamization of Western Europe continues it will probably not be very long before politicians describe the Nazi genocide of the Jews as an “extremely sensitive” issue on which “international experts disagree.” Some European schools are already leaving the Holocaust out of their history lessons to avoid offending Muslim pupils. These developments are inevitable in countries where the political establishment is catering to a growing electorate of radicals.

Ehsan Jami claims he is willing to “change things from the inside.” The immigrant vote, however, has already changed European democracies from the inside, turning their politicians into appeasing weasels. The only immigrants they are eager to get rid of are Muslim apostates.

Si nous confondons la démocratie avec la simple raison des plus nombreux, nous perdrons la démocratie. Et la simple raison avec elle.

Comments

  1. Alexandre
    July 7th, 2007 | 10:18 am

    Les bienfaits du socialisme européen :

    – Stagnation économique, égalitarisme forcé, nivellement par le bas, chômage endémique.
    – Anéantissement de l’initiative, destruction de l’esprit d’entreprise, exil des cerveaux et des jeunes capables et ambitieux.
    – Dé-résponsabilisation des individus pris en charge par l’Etat providence, maintenus dans un cocon d’allocations sociales, subventions et assurances.
    – Déformation du langage et totalitarisme du politiquement correct. Idéologies de la bienfaisance et théories sur la solidarité avec l’argent du
    contribuable Culpabilisation de toute forme de patriotisme ou de fierté nationale.
    – Dévalorisation de citoyenneté et naturalisations galopantes. Transformation du territoire national dans un camping ou un dépotoir pour la surpopulation et la misère du monde musulman et africain.
    – Adoption d’une politique de colonisation de son propre pays pour des raisons électorales déguisées en discours moralisateurs. Délinquance, ghettoïsation ethnique, destruction de l’esprit national dans un melting-pot qui n’a aucun sens et aucun avenir car, à la différence des US, ce melting-pot est encouragé a vivre de manière disjointe et suivre des valeurs en collision frontale)

    Jamais au cours de l’histoire, une population autochtone n’a cédé ses villes, ses campagnes et ses villages en si peu de temps, jamais elle n’a volontairement abandonné ses propres valeurs et pourchassé ceux qui les défendent. L’invasion si brutale et si décriée des conquistadors a-t-elle conduit à des tes changements de pourcentages en moins d’un quart de siècle ?

    D’un point de vue darwiniste, le socialisme, a engendré un écosystème désastreux, celui de l’état social, avec des répercussions catastrophiques sur la capacité des individus à s’adapter et de lutter pour leur survie. Le grand laboratoire du socialisme a produit un mutant, l’hommo socialo-europaeus, un dégénéré peu capable de survivre sans le système d’allocations, de subventions, de retraites, d’assuarnces, de garanties et de lois protectives l’accompagnant depuis la maternité jusqu’à la tombe. Aux US un ingénieur de 40 ans est en pleine effervescence professionnelle, évolue, se re-oriente, s’adapte, change et cherche continuellement des nouveaux défis. Pour beaucoup c’est le grand moment du saut vers les start-up. En France, les vingt-et-peux vandalisent les rues parce qu’on ne leur garantit pas un emploi …

    On nous explique qu’un tel système social est “civilisé”. Idiotismes et inepties bonnes a gober par ceux qui n’ont aucune notion de l’histoire et/ou qui ont peur de leur médiocrité. Une civilisation se définit d’abord par une volonté d’être, une énergie vitale, par le nerf, la fibre, la confiance dans ses propres institutions et les valeurs morales qui les soutiennent.

    Le problème de l’Europe ce n’est pas l’islam. Ce sont les européens eux-mêmes. C’est l’irresponsabilité, la lâcheté, l’indifférence ou le crétinisme de la grande majorité qui ignore sa propre histoire et qui a perdu le sens et l’obligation morale de perpétuer un peuple et une civilisation.

  2. July 8th, 2007 | 7:44 pm

    […] [3] Ou, pire, en reniant l’islam. Et ils ne doivent pas trop compter sur l’aide de certains de nos politiciens : http://www.ajm.ch/wordpress/?p=712 […]